<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Liability for Notification Conditions: Is the Original Licensee or Transferee Responsible in Customs Law?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43033</link>
    <description>Advance licenses - who is liable to fulfill the condition of notification, the original licensee or the “transferee” of the licensee? - Any way onus to prove that input stage credit was not availed in respect of the goods exported is not certainly on the “transferee” the licence i.e. appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 09:01:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 09:01:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Liability for Notification Conditions: Is the Original Licensee or Transferee Responsible in Customs Law?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43033</link>
      <description>Advance licenses - who is liable to fulfill the condition of notification, the original licensee or the “transferee” of the licensee? - Any way onus to prove that input stage credit was not availed in respect of the goods exported is not certainly on the “transferee” the licence i.e. appellants.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 09:01:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>