<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 84 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371315</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that no demand for service tax was sustainable against the appellants as they eventually paid the invoices. However, they were directed to pay interest for the intervening period and reduced the penalty to Rs. 2000 in each appeal. The appeals were disposed of, emphasizing compliance with Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, regarding availing Cenvat credit on input services after payment of invoices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 09:00:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 84 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371315</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that no demand for service tax was sustainable against the appellants as they eventually paid the invoices. However, they were directed to pay interest for the intervening period and reduced the penalty to Rs. 2000 in each appeal. The appeals were disposed of, emphasizing compliance with Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, regarding availing Cenvat credit on input services after payment of invoices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>