https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371314 Construction activity involving both supply of services and transfer of property in goods was held to be a composite works contract service, not construction of residential complex service or commercial or industrial construction service. Applying the governing classification principle, the taxable entry adopted in the impugned order was incorrect because the activity could not be assessed under the wrong construction-related category. As a result, the service tax demand raised under that classification was not sustainable and the impugned order was set aside. en-us Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 09:00:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371314 Construction activity involving both supply of services and transfer of property in goods was held to be a composite works contract service, not construction of residential complex service or commercial or industrial construction service. Applying the governing classification principle, the taxable entry adopted in the impugned order was incorrect because the activity could not be assessed under the wrong construction-related category. As a result, the service tax demand raised under that classification was not sustainable and the impugned order was set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371314