<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1804 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277361</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 74,63,557/- to the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of basing assessments on evidence and audited accounts rather than statements from surveys. It upheld that retracted statements without corroborative evidence cannot solely justify income additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 08:57:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1804 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277361</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 74,63,557/- to the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of basing assessments on evidence and audited accounts rather than statements from surveys. It upheld that retracted statements without corroborative evidence cannot solely justify income additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>