<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty under rules 25 and 27 of CE Rules 2002</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114371</link>
    <description>Both penalties under Rule 25 and Rule 27 should not be imposed for the same demand; refraining from invoking Rule 27 after applying Rule 25 is appropriate. Rule 25 is subject to the statutory limitation in Section 11AC and a penalty under Rule 25 must not exceed the duty found to be evaded. The penalty percentage was applied on the basis that the assessee satisfied the condition in Section 11AC(1)(d).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:37:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty under rules 25 and 27 of CE Rules 2002</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114371</link>
      <description>Both penalties under Rule 25 and Rule 27 should not be imposed for the same demand; refraining from invoking Rule 27 after applying Rule 25 is appropriate. Rule 25 is subject to the statutory limitation in Section 11AC and a penalty under Rule 25 must not exceed the duty found to be evaded. The penalty percentage was applied on the basis that the assessee satisfied the condition in Section 11AC(1)(d).</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:37:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>