https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15507 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring them as the absolute owner of the property purchased from the President of India, considering it a first sale. The demand for enhanced ground rent by the Land and Development Officer was deemed illegal and in violation of the petitioner's ownership rights under Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India. The court quashed the demand for enhanced ground rent and upheld the petitioner's rights, ultimately allowing the petition without costs. en-us Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:23:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15507 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring them as the absolute owner of the property purchased from the President of India, considering it a first sale. The demand for enhanced ground rent by the Land and Development Officer was deemed illegal and in violation of the petitioner's ownership rights under Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India. The court quashed the demand for enhanced ground rent and upheld the petitioner's rights, ultimately allowing the petition without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15507