<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15505</link>
    <description>Reassessment of gift-tax under section 16(1)(b) was invalid where the assessee had valued gifted shares using one recognised valuation method accepted in the original assessment. The Revenue sought reopening only because another recognised method, or a revaluation based on rule 10(2), might produce a higher figure. The Court held that reopening a concluded assessment is not justified merely to substitute a different accepted method of valuation when no escapement of gift-tax is shown. The reassessment was therefore struck down in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:18:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15505</link>
      <description>Reassessment of gift-tax under section 16(1)(b) was invalid where the assessee had valued gifted shares using one recognised valuation method accepted in the original assessment. The Revenue sought reopening only because another recognised method, or a revaluation based on rule 10(2), might produce a higher figure. The Court held that reopening a concluded assessment is not justified merely to substitute a different accepted method of valuation when no escapement of gift-tax is shown. The reassessment was therefore struck down in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>