<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (3) TMI 28 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277351</link>
    <description>For director-control under the Excess Profits Tax Act, the relevant test is whether the directors held a controlling voting interest based on the shares standing in their names and the votes attached to those shares, rather than on speculative assumptions about how other shareholders might exercise voting rights. On that basis, the directors&#039; shareholding gave them only a minority of the votes, so the company was not director-controlled. On the separate question, the commission payable to the managing agents was treated as a debt due by the company, following the governing principle previously applied by the Court on the same statutory issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 15:51:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (3) TMI 28 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277351</link>
      <description>For director-control under the Excess Profits Tax Act, the relevant test is whether the directors held a controlling voting interest based on the shares standing in their names and the votes attached to those shares, rather than on speculative assumptions about how other shareholders might exercise voting rights. On that basis, the directors&#039; shareholding gave them only a minority of the votes, so the company was not director-controlled. On the separate question, the commission payable to the managing agents was treated as a debt due by the company, following the governing principle previously applied by the Court on the same statutory issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>