<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1921 (1) TMI 2 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277344</link>
    <description>Subscriptions and receipts collected by a club from its own members were treated as mutual contributions for their common benefit, not taxable income derived from outsiders or from trade. Applying the mutual benefit principle, the club did not earn taxable profit merely because member contributions exceeded the cost of amenities, so long as any surplus remained within the common fund for members&#039; benefit. Incorporation did not change the character of those receipts. However, liability for house property was ? Need English. The Act separately taxed the value of owned house property irrespective of occupation or realised income, so the club remained liable on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 14:16:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1921 (1) TMI 2 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277344</link>
      <description>Subscriptions and receipts collected by a club from its own members were treated as mutual contributions for their common benefit, not taxable income derived from outsiders or from trade. Applying the mutual benefit principle, the club did not earn taxable profit merely because member contributions exceeded the cost of amenities, so long as any surplus remained within the common fund for members&#039; benefit. Incorporation did not change the character of those receipts. However, liability for house property was ? Need English. The Act separately taxed the value of owned house property irrespective of occupation or realised income, so the club remained liable on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>