<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1939 (5) TMI 15 - JUDICIAL COMMISSIONERS COURT OF SIND</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277342</link>
    <description>A mutual association does not derive taxable profit from fees paid by members for services rendered to them when the receipts are used for the members&#039; own benefit. The decisive test was whether the receipts represented profit or a surplus from members combining to provide services for themselves; the Chamber was treated as an incorporated association acting for its members. Incidental services to outsiders did not destroy mutuality where member and non-member receipts were capable of separate identification, and on the facts the member-related measurement activity predominated. The measurement fees from members were therefore not taxable income, and the question was answered in the negative for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 1939 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 13:19:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1939 (5) TMI 15 - JUDICIAL COMMISSIONERS COURT OF SIND</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277342</link>
      <description>A mutual association does not derive taxable profit from fees paid by members for services rendered to them when the receipts are used for the members&#039; own benefit. The decisive test was whether the receipts represented profit or a surplus from members combining to provide services for themselves; the Chamber was treated as an incorporated association acting for its members. Incidental services to outsiders did not destroy mutuality where member and non-member receipts were capable of separate identification, and on the facts the member-related measurement activity predominated. The measurement fees from members were therefore not taxable income, and the question was answered in the negative for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 1939 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>