https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371299 The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the seizure of goods for not having an E-way bill. The court found that the petitioner had complied with legal requirements by issuing the E-way bill before the detention, leading to the release of the goods and vehicle seized. The seizure order and penalty notice were set aside, as the court determined no fault on the petitioner's part. en-us Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371299 The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the seizure of goods for not having an E-way bill. The court found that the petitioner had complied with legal requirements by issuing the E-way bill before the detention, leading to the release of the goods and vehicle seized. The seizure order and penalty notice were set aside, as the court determined no fault on the petitioner's part. Case-Laws GST Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371299