<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 67 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371298</link>
    <description>The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) determined that the supply of goods moved from a place outside India and delivered to a place outside India is not liable to tax in India under section 7(5)(a) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Act. Consequently, the question of the recipient&#039;s eligibility to avail input tax credit was deemed irrelevant as the transaction was not subject to IGST.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 67 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371298</link>
      <description>The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) determined that the supply of goods moved from a place outside India and delivered to a place outside India is not liable to tax in India under section 7(5)(a) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Act. Consequently, the question of the recipient&#039;s eligibility to avail input tax credit was deemed irrelevant as the transaction was not subject to IGST.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>