<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 60 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371291</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions. The Court found that the Assessee had adequate own funds for share investments and that the remission of loan liability did not fall under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The Court concluded that the issues did not raise substantial questions of law, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:42:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 60 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371291</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions. The Court found that the Assessee had adequate own funds for share investments and that the remission of loan liability did not fall under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The Court concluded that the issues did not raise substantial questions of law, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>