<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 53 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided all relevant details and evidence, and the Assessing Officer failed to establish concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars through detailed inquiry. Therefore, the penalty was deemed unwarranted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:42:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 53 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided all relevant details and evidence, and the Assessing Officer failed to establish concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars through detailed inquiry. Therefore, the penalty was deemed unwarranted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>