<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15498</link>
    <description>The High Court of MADRAS upheld the decision of the Tribunal regarding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) partially setting aside an assessment order for an assessee company. The Court affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s wide discretionary powers in directing the Income-tax Officer to reconsider the status determination alone, finding it proper and not arbitrary. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed appropriate, with no jurisdictional overreach, and the Court reframed the question of law in favor of the Tribunal against the Department, emphasizing the importance of judicial discretion and adherence to precedents in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:38:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15498</link>
      <description>The High Court of MADRAS upheld the decision of the Tribunal regarding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) partially setting aside an assessment order for an assessee company. The Court affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s wide discretionary powers in directing the Income-tax Officer to reconsider the status determination alone, finding it proper and not arbitrary. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed appropriate, with no jurisdictional overreach, and the Court reframed the question of law in favor of the Tribunal against the Department, emphasizing the importance of judicial discretion and adherence to precedents in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>