https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371257 Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised against SARFAESI notices where an efficacious statutory appeal is available under the Act. Applying the rule of self-imposed restraint, the High Court noted that the petitioner had already invoked the statutory mechanism before the Tribunal and had an appeal remedy under Section 18, with no pleaded exceptional ground such as breach of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or challenge to vires. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue remedies under the SARFAESI framework. en-us Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:39:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371257 Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised against SARFAESI notices where an efficacious statutory appeal is available under the Act. Applying the rule of self-imposed restraint, the High Court noted that the petitioner had already invoked the statutory mechanism before the Tribunal and had an appeal remedy under Section 18, with no pleaded exceptional ground such as breach of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or challenge to vires. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue remedies under the SARFAESI framework. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371257