<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 23 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the show cause notice issued by the Department for alleged non-payment of Service Tax amounting to Rs. 67,918 was barred by limitation. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s refund claim, though initially rejected, was later allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals). Despite the Department&#039;s argument that the appellant should have deposited the disputed tax amount, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the payment made, even under a wrong Code, should not incur further liabilities. The Tribunal deemed the Department&#039;s allegation of suppression of facts unsustainable, ultimately allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:39:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 23 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the show cause notice issued by the Department for alleged non-payment of Service Tax amounting to Rs. 67,918 was barred by limitation. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s refund claim, though initially rejected, was later allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals). Despite the Department&#039;s argument that the appellant should have deposited the disputed tax amount, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the payment made, even under a wrong Code, should not incur further liabilities. The Tribunal deemed the Department&#039;s allegation of suppression of facts unsustainable, ultimately allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>