<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 9 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371240</link>
    <description>Railway wagons qualified for concessional duty under Notification No. 452/86-CE because the documentary record showed a declared payload capacity not exceeding 60 MT. The adjudicating authority accepted the railway drawing and design records, and the department produced no convincing evidence to displace that documentation with its internal material suggesting a marginal excess. On that basis, the exemption was held available and the demand for differential duty was not sustainable, so the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:38:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 9 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371240</link>
      <description>Railway wagons qualified for concessional duty under Notification No. 452/86-CE because the documentary record showed a declared payload capacity not exceeding 60 MT. The adjudicating authority accepted the railway drawing and design records, and the department produced no convincing evidence to displace that documentation with its internal material suggesting a marginal excess. On that basis, the exemption was held available and the demand for differential duty was not sustainable, so the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>