<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1159 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277323</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, permitting deductions for certain items while disallowing others. Deductions for bad debts written off were allowed based on a Supreme Court decision, with restrictions on debit balances written off. The Tribunal allowed a donation as a business expenditure and adjusted royalty payments. Provisions for obsolescence of inventory and warranty expenses were upheld, with a direction to reconsider warranty expenses based on a Supreme Court decision. The Tribunal allowed deduction for debit balances written off and directed further consideration of a claim under section 40(a)(ia) by the AO. Compliance with legal precedents and proper documentation were emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:35:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1159 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277323</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, permitting deductions for certain items while disallowing others. Deductions for bad debts written off were allowed based on a Supreme Court decision, with restrictions on debit balances written off. The Tribunal allowed a donation as a business expenditure and adjusted royalty payments. Provisions for obsolescence of inventory and warranty expenses were upheld, with a direction to reconsider warranty expenses based on a Supreme Court decision. The Tribunal allowed deduction for debit balances written off and directed further consideration of a claim under section 40(a)(ia) by the AO. Compliance with legal precedents and proper documentation were emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>