<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (8) TMI 114 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277306</link>
    <description>A bidi roller is a worker under the Factories Act where the employer retains control and supervision over both the work and the manner of performance, reflecting a contract of service. Leave wages under Sections 79 and 80 are available only if the statutory formula for computing &quot;total full time earnings&quot; can be applied to the actual terms of work. Where the work is flexible and no ascertainable full-time period exists, the computation mechanism fails and leave wages cannot be claimed on that basis. The text states that, on the facts discussed, worker status was accepted but leave wage entitlement was denied because the statutory scheme could not be worked out for the kind of bidi-rolling work involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 10:12:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (8) TMI 114 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277306</link>
      <description>A bidi roller is a worker under the Factories Act where the employer retains control and supervision over both the work and the manner of performance, reflecting a contract of service. Leave wages under Sections 79 and 80 are available only if the statutory formula for computing &quot;total full time earnings&quot; can be applied to the actual terms of work. Where the work is flexible and no ascertainable full-time period exists, the computation mechanism fails and leave wages cannot be claimed on that basis. The text states that, on the facts discussed, worker status was accepted but leave wage entitlement was denied because the statutory scheme could not be worked out for the kind of bidi-rolling work involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>