<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1938 (3) TMI 22 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277302</link>
    <description>Foreign interest on securities accruing and remaining outside British India was not &quot;received in British India&quot; under section 4 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 merely because it was entered in the company&#039;s accounts, balance-sheet, directors&#039; report, or used in dividend calculations. Actual receipt in India, or a statutory deeming provision bringing the income within Indian receipt, was required. As the interest was kept and reinvested abroad and no remittance or equivalent transmission to India was shown, it could not be assessed on a receipt basis. The reference was therefore answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 1938 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:10:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1938 (3) TMI 22 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277302</link>
      <description>Foreign interest on securities accruing and remaining outside British India was not &quot;received in British India&quot; under section 4 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 merely because it was entered in the company&#039;s accounts, balance-sheet, directors&#039; report, or used in dividend calculations. Actual receipt in India, or a statutory deeming provision bringing the income within Indian receipt, was required. As the interest was kept and reinvested abroad and no remittance or equivalent transmission to India was shown, it could not be assessed on a receipt basis. The reference was therefore answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 1938 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>