<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1341 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277296</link>
    <description>Deduction under Section 80P was claimed on income from sale of crackers and PDS activities, with the assessee contending that the PDS activity fell under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) rather than Section 80P(2)(f). The Tribunal noted that these issues were already decided against the assessee in its own case for an earlier assessment year and followed that earlier view. On that basis, the deduction claims were rejected and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:37:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1341 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277296</link>
      <description>Deduction under Section 80P was claimed on income from sale of crackers and PDS activities, with the assessee contending that the PDS activity fell under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) rather than Section 80P(2)(f). The Tribunal noted that these issues were already decided against the assessee in its own case for an earlier assessment year and followed that earlier view. On that basis, the deduction claims were rejected and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>