https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277284 A prerogative writ of certiorari was held unavailable to control a mofussil revenue determination on rent settlement merely because the Board of Revenue was located in Madras; the High Court's chartered and statutory jurisdiction did not extend that control to such proceedings between Indian parties. On the merits, fair and equitable rent fixed under Chapter XI of the Madras Estates Land Act, 1908 was not confined by the enhancement ceiling applicable to ordinary enhancement proceedings under Section 30. The authority could consider a wider range of relevant factors, and the rent enhancement of 37 1/2 per cent was upheld. The challenge therefore failed on jurisdiction and on merits. en-us Mon, 10 May 1943 00:00:00 +0630 Fri, 30 Nov 2018 12:12:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277284 A prerogative writ of certiorari was held unavailable to control a mofussil revenue determination on rent settlement merely because the Board of Revenue was located in Madras; the High Court's chartered and statutory jurisdiction did not extend that control to such proceedings between Indian parties. On the merits, fair and equitable rent fixed under Chapter XI of the Madras Estates Land Act, 1908 was not confined by the enhancement ceiling applicable to ordinary enhancement proceedings under Section 30. The authority could consider a wider range of relevant factors, and the rent enhancement of 37 1/2 per cent was upheld. The challenge therefore failed on jurisdiction and on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 May 1943 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277284