<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (10) TMI 24 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277278</link>
    <description>The Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 continued to operate in Darjeeling because the Governor&#039;s notification applied the Act without a shorter temporal limit, so subsequent extensions of the Act&#039;s duration automatically extended its local operation. Constitutional adaptations after independence validly enabled the Constituent Assembly to exercise the relevant extension powers, without unlawful delegation. Criminal intent was inferred from the accused&#039;s false explanation, absence of a permit, and inability of the employers to produce one. These principles supported the conclusion that the Act remained applicable and that mens rea was established, sustaining both convictions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:19:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (10) TMI 24 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277278</link>
      <description>The Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 continued to operate in Darjeeling because the Governor&#039;s notification applied the Act without a shorter temporal limit, so subsequent extensions of the Act&#039;s duration automatically extended its local operation. Constitutional adaptations after independence validly enabled the Constituent Assembly to exercise the relevant extension powers, without unlawful delegation. Criminal intent was inferred from the accused&#039;s false explanation, absence of a permit, and inability of the employers to produce one. These principles supported the conclusion that the Act remained applicable and that mens rea was established, sustaining both convictions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>