<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1547 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371204</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals for the Assessment Years 1998-99, 1999-2000, and 2000-01, on 27/11/2018. The Tribunal found that the appellant provided details of deposits and sources, concluding that the lack of producing parties before the Ld.AO did not imply concealment. As the addition was already confirmed, the penalty was deleted, allowing the grounds raised by the appellant on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:24:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1547 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371204</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals for the Assessment Years 1998-99, 1999-2000, and 2000-01, on 27/11/2018. The Tribunal found that the appellant provided details of deposits and sources, concluding that the lack of producing parties before the Ld.AO did not imply concealment. As the addition was already confirmed, the penalty was deleted, allowing the grounds raised by the appellant on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>