https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371192 Imported chocolates were not liable to rejection for curable labelling defects in secondary packing where the description "compound chocolates" did not indicate any intent to mislead consumers and could be corrected by relabelling. The court also accepted that the omission or inadequacy of the declaration on vegetable fats or oils, assessed only on visual examination and declarations without testing, could be remedied by allowing the labels to be corrected to meet food safety requirements. The proper course was to permit relabelling and then issue the NOC, rather than refuse import on the stated grounds. en-us Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 14:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371192 Imported chocolates were not liable to rejection for curable labelling defects in secondary packing where the description "compound chocolates" did not indicate any intent to mislead consumers and could be corrected by relabelling. The court also accepted that the omission or inadequacy of the declaration on vegetable fats or oils, assessed only on visual examination and declarations without testing, could be remedied by allowing the labels to be corrected to meet food safety requirements. The proper course was to permit relabelling and then issue the NOC, rather than refuse import on the stated grounds. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371192