<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>EOU Debonding Case: Procedural Lapses Shouldn&#039;t Deny Benefits Under Notifications 25/99-Cus &amp; 25/2002-Cus.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42987</link>
    <description>100% EOU - Debonding of EOU - if any lapse on the part of the appellant it is mere procedural lapse. For this reason, the substantial benefit of notification no. 25/99-Cus and 25/2002-Cus cannot be denied</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:23:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:23:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>EOU Debonding Case: Procedural Lapses Shouldn&#039;t Deny Benefits Under Notifications 25/99-Cus &amp; 25/2002-Cus.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42987</link>
      <description>100% EOU - Debonding of EOU - if any lapse on the part of the appellant it is mere procedural lapse. For this reason, the substantial benefit of notification no. 25/99-Cus and 25/2002-Cus cannot be denied</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:23:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>