https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371187 The High Court dismissed the writ petitions seeking to quash an order confirming duty drawback demand for a period prior to five years. Emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies, the court directed the petitioners to pursue the alternative remedy of filing an appeal against the impugned order within a specified timeframe to avoid dismissal on grounds of limitation. The court cited relevant case law and highlighted that interference under Article 226 should be avoided when an adequate alternative remedy exists, unless exceptional circumstances warrant intervention. en-us Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371187 The High Court dismissed the writ petitions seeking to quash an order confirming duty drawback demand for a period prior to five years. Emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies, the court directed the petitioners to pursue the alternative remedy of filing an appeal against the impugned order within a specified timeframe to avoid dismissal on grounds of limitation. The court cited relevant case law and highlighted that interference under Article 226 should be avoided when an adequate alternative remedy exists, unless exceptional circumstances warrant intervention. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371187