<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1529 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371186</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that Section 17 of the Limitation Act does not apply to extend the time for filing objections under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act. The court set aside the High Court&#039;s remand order and the trial court&#039;s order condoning the delay in filing objections. The appeals were allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1529 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371186</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that Section 17 of the Limitation Act does not apply to extend the time for filing objections under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act. The court set aside the High Court&#039;s remand order and the trial court&#039;s order condoning the delay in filing objections. The appeals were allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>