<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1526 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371183</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision allowing Cenvat Credit on &quot;Medical Insurance Service,&quot; emphasizing the service&#039;s nexus with business operations and its role in ensuring proper treatment for employees. Relying on precedents from the Hon&#039;ble Karnataka High Court and established legal principles, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the admissibility of the credit. The decision was based on the interpretation of the definition of &quot;input service&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the legislative intent behind subsequent amendments. The judgment was delivered on 20-11-2018 by Shri Ajay Sharma, Member (Judicial) at the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:22:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1526 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371183</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision allowing Cenvat Credit on &quot;Medical Insurance Service,&quot; emphasizing the service&#039;s nexus with business operations and its role in ensuring proper treatment for employees. Relying on precedents from the Hon&#039;ble Karnataka High Court and established legal principles, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the admissibility of the credit. The decision was based on the interpretation of the definition of &quot;input service&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the legislative intent behind subsequent amendments. The judgment was delivered on 20-11-2018 by Shri Ajay Sharma, Member (Judicial) at the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>