<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1522 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the income surrendered to the Income-Tax Department did not constitute turnover from services provided by the appellant. Due to the lack of evidence linking the surrendered income to services, the demand for service tax was not upheld. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1522 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the income surrendered to the Income-Tax Department did not constitute turnover from services provided by the appellant. Due to the lack of evidence linking the surrendered income to services, the demand for service tax was not upheld. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>