<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1518 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371175</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for verification of the reversal particulars of irregular Cenvat Credit claimed by the appellant. It set aside the penalty imposed, ruling that there was no intention to defraud the government revenue as the availed credit was not utilized for paying service tax on output services. The Tribunal found the penalty unjustifiable and ordered its removal, disposing of the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:21:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1518 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371175</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for verification of the reversal particulars of irregular Cenvat Credit claimed by the appellant. It set aside the penalty imposed, ruling that there was no intention to defraud the government revenue as the availed credit was not utilized for paying service tax on output services. The Tribunal found the penalty unjustifiable and ordered its removal, disposing of the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>