<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1508 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371165</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 2/95-CE for DTA clearances of lipsticks was available only if the assessee satisfied the conditions attached to the advance sale permission and the notification itself. The assessee had obtained permission on the basis that expanded production would support lipstick exports, but the lipsticks were not exported and the stipulated conditions were not met. The text reiterates that exemption notifications must be strictly construed and that the assessee bears the burden of proving full compliance with every prescribed condition before claiming concessional duty treatment. On that basis, the duty demand was confirmed and the exemption was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:21:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1508 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371165</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 2/95-CE for DTA clearances of lipsticks was available only if the assessee satisfied the conditions attached to the advance sale permission and the notification itself. The assessee had obtained permission on the basis that expanded production would support lipstick exports, but the lipsticks were not exported and the stipulated conditions were not met. The text reiterates that exemption notifications must be strictly construed and that the assessee bears the burden of proving full compliance with every prescribed condition before claiming concessional duty treatment. On that basis, the duty demand was confirmed and the exemption was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>