<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1507 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371164</link>
    <description>Where two units of the same assessee operated under Notification No. 56/2002-CE, duty paid by one unit was refundable and creditable within the same entity, making the situation revenue neutral. On those facts, an alleged excess duty payment did not create a sustainable demand. The refund already sanctioned had not been challenged by the Revenue, so the denial of refund could not be maintained. The Revenue&#039;s appeals therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:21:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1507 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371164</link>
      <description>Where two units of the same assessee operated under Notification No. 56/2002-CE, duty paid by one unit was refundable and creditable within the same entity, making the situation revenue neutral. On those facts, an alleged excess duty payment did not create a sustainable demand. The refund already sanctioned had not been challenged by the Revenue, so the denial of refund could not be maintained. The Revenue&#039;s appeals therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>