<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1402 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277257</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition alleging oppression and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 1956, citing delay, laches, estoppel, and acquiescence. It held that the matter fell outside its jurisdiction, emphasizing family co-parcenary rights over company law issues. The petition was deemed untimely and lacking merit, resulting in its dismissal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 06:34:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1402 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277257</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition alleging oppression and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 1956, citing delay, laches, estoppel, and acquiescence. It held that the matter fell outside its jurisdiction, emphasizing family co-parcenary rights over company law issues. The petition was deemed untimely and lacking merit, resulting in its dismissal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>