<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1639 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277258</link>
    <description>Section 80HHC treatment distinguishes the face value of DEPB from profit on its transfer, with the exclusion mechanism applying to the profit element rather than the entire receipt. Sample design and development charges connected with export operations are characterised as export-business receipts, not incidental receipts comparable to brokerage, commission, interest, rent or charges under Explanation (baa). Additional depreciation may be examined on additional evidence at the appellate stage where the claim is verifiable and remand proceedings reveal no adverse material. Royalty under a genuine licensing arrangement may support arm&#039;s length pricing where embedded in product prices and supported by the taxpayer&#039;s operating margins and transaction profile.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1639 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277258</link>
      <description>Section 80HHC treatment distinguishes the face value of DEPB from profit on its transfer, with the exclusion mechanism applying to the profit element rather than the entire receipt. Sample design and development charges connected with export operations are characterised as export-business receipts, not incidental receipts comparable to brokerage, commission, interest, rent or charges under Explanation (baa). Additional depreciation may be examined on additional evidence at the appellate stage where the claim is verifiable and remand proceedings reveal no adverse material. Royalty under a genuine licensing arrangement may support arm&#039;s length pricing where embedded in product prices and supported by the taxpayer&#039;s operating margins and transaction profile.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>