https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277261 The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment and decree of the trial court. The trial court's decision that the suit was barred by limitation was found flawed as it did not consider the continuing cause of action. The court held that Section 14 of the Limitation Act should be interpreted liberally, allowing exclusion of time spent in prosecuting a writ petition related to the same issue. The matter was remitted back to the trial court for adjudication, with parties to appear on a specified date, and no costs were awarded. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Nov 2018 06:34:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277261 The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment and decree of the trial court. The trial court's decision that the suit was barred by limitation was found flawed as it did not consider the continuing cause of action. The court held that Section 14 of the Limitation Act should be interpreted liberally, allowing exclusion of time spent in prosecuting a writ petition related to the same issue. The matter was remitted back to the trial court for adjudication, with parties to appear on a specified date, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277261