<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1394 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277268</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax in addition to the 12.5% already paid within six weeks for an interim stay of collection pending the disposal of the first appeal under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The judgment highlighted the importance of meeting pre-conditions for appeals and equitable considerations in granting stays in tax cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 06:34:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1394 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277268</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax in addition to the 12.5% already paid within six weeks for an interim stay of collection pending the disposal of the first appeal under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The judgment highlighted the importance of meeting pre-conditions for appeals and equitable considerations in granting stays in tax cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>