https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277271 The Department's appeal against the Order-in-Original was allowed by the Tribunal due to the wrong quoting of provisions, with rectification sought under Section 11A2. Penalties on appellant No. 3 and 4 were imposed, while the appeal regarding noticee No. 3 and 4 was dismissed for lack of a separate appeal addressing the penalty issue. The Tribunal emphasized the need for accurate citation of provisions in legal orders and the importance of addressing all relevant issues in separate appeals for a thorough review. en-us Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Nov 2018 06:34:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277271 The Department's appeal against the Order-in-Original was allowed by the Tribunal due to the wrong quoting of provisions, with rectification sought under Section 11A2. Penalties on appellant No. 3 and 4 were imposed, while the appeal regarding noticee No. 3 and 4 was dismissed for lack of a separate appeal addressing the penalty issue. The Tribunal emphasized the need for accurate citation of provisions in legal orders and the importance of addressing all relevant issues in separate appeals for a thorough review. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277271