<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (9) TMI 77 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277252</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the C.P. &amp;amp; Berar Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1947, following amendments to Articles 19(6) and 31(2) by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951, and the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1955. The Court dismissed the petitions challenging the Act, ruling that the amendments allowing state monopolies and regulating property rights were constitutional post the aforementioned legislative changes. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:17:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (9) TMI 77 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277252</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the C.P. &amp;amp; Berar Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1947, following amendments to Articles 19(6) and 31(2) by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951, and the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1955. The Court dismissed the petitions challenging the Act, ruling that the amendments allowing state monopolies and regulating property rights were constitutional post the aforementioned legislative changes. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>