https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277251 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, declaring Section 8-A of the challenged Ordinance as void for violating Article 14 of the Constitution due to its discriminatory nature. The Court found no reasonable classification or substantial distinction justifying the differential treatment of Jagirdars from different areas. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the respondent's right to collect rents from their Jagir, with costs imposed on the appellant. en-us Mon, 15 Mar 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:09:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277251 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, declaring Section 8-A of the challenged Ordinance as void for violating Article 14 of the Constitution due to its discriminatory nature. The Court found no reasonable classification or substantial distinction justifying the differential treatment of Jagirdars from different areas. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the respondent's right to collect rents from their Jagir, with costs imposed on the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Mar 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277251