<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1167 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277249</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the deletion of an addition of Rs. 38.4 lakhs made on account of the introduction of share capital under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to establish the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions, leading to the restoration of the Assessing Officer&#039;s order and sustaining the addition of Rs. 38.4 lakhs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:03:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1167 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277249</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the deletion of an addition of Rs. 38.4 lakhs made on account of the introduction of share capital under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to establish the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions, leading to the restoration of the Assessing Officer&#039;s order and sustaining the addition of Rs. 38.4 lakhs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>