<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (8) TMI 28 - ASSAM HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277235</link>
    <description>Receipts from sale of sal trees grown in forest tracts were treated as agricultural income where recurring forestry operations involved systematic human skill and labour on the land, including blocking and rotation, removal of creepers and diseased trees, clearing undergrowth, fire protection, grazing control, and preservation of mother trees. The majority held that agriculture under the Income-tax Act is not limited to ploughing, sowing, or tilling, and that such operations were sufficient to bring the land within agricultural purpose and the receipts within the statutory exemption. A dissent considered the activity mere preservation of spontaneous forests and not agriculture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:23:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (8) TMI 28 - ASSAM HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277235</link>
      <description>Receipts from sale of sal trees grown in forest tracts were treated as agricultural income where recurring forestry operations involved systematic human skill and labour on the land, including blocking and rotation, removal of creepers and diseased trees, clearing undergrowth, fire protection, grazing control, and preservation of mother trees. The majority held that agriculture under the Income-tax Act is not limited to ploughing, sowing, or tilling, and that such operations were sufficient to bring the land within agricultural purpose and the receipts within the statutory exemption. A dissent considered the activity mere preservation of spontaneous forests and not agriculture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>