<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1933 (3) TMI 22 - HIGH COURT OF HOUSE OF LORDS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277232</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the assessment under Schedule D was discharged. The judgment concluded that the fees for the services of the stallions are part of the gains from the occupation of the land and should be covered by the assessment under Schedule B, not Schedule D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1933 (3) TMI 22 - HIGH COURT OF HOUSE OF LORDS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277232</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the assessment under Schedule D was discharged. The judgment concluded that the fees for the services of the stallions are part of the gains from the occupation of the land and should be covered by the assessment under Schedule B, not Schedule D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>