<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1932 (4) TMI 17 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277231</link>
    <description>A registered firm cannot enter into a partnership in its own capacity because, under the Indian Contract Act, a firm is not a &quot;person&quot; but only a collective name for its partners. The article distinguishes that contractual incapacity from income-tax treatment: the Income-tax Act may assess a firm as a taxable entity, but that does not convert it into a legal person for partnership purposes. On the stated facts, profits credited through associated firms could not be treated as arising from a valid partnership in the firm&#039;s corporate capacity; the real inquiry remained whether the income belonged to the firm or to the individual partners. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:42:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1932 (4) TMI 17 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277231</link>
      <description>A registered firm cannot enter into a partnership in its own capacity because, under the Indian Contract Act, a firm is not a &quot;person&quot; but only a collective name for its partners. The article distinguishes that contractual incapacity from income-tax treatment: the Income-tax Act may assess a firm as a taxable entity, but that does not convert it into a legal person for partnership purposes. On the stated facts, profits credited through associated firms could not be treated as arising from a valid partnership in the firm&#039;s corporate capacity; the real inquiry remained whether the income belonged to the firm or to the individual partners. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>