<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (12) TMI 32 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277220</link>
    <description>Directors&#039; remuneration paid in British India was held deductible in full as a business expense in computing taxable income. The court found no agreement or statutory basis for apportioning any part of the fees to the exempt Gwalior undertaking, and the existence of exempt Gwalior income did not justify a proportionate disallowance. In the absence of a specific allocation, the directors&#039; fees were treated as a single expense incurred in earning the company&#039;s income, so the attempted disallowance of a part of the deduction was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:46:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (12) TMI 32 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277220</link>
      <description>Directors&#039; remuneration paid in British India was held deductible in full as a business expense in computing taxable income. The court found no agreement or statutory basis for apportioning any part of the fees to the exempt Gwalior undertaking, and the existence of exempt Gwalior income did not justify a proportionate disallowance. In the absence of a specific allocation, the directors&#039; fees were treated as a single expense incurred in earning the company&#039;s income, so the attempted disallowance of a part of the deduction was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>