<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (3) TMI 46 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277219</link>
    <description>Expenditure incurred before a new business has commenced is treated as preliminary expense and is not deductible in computing business income. Managing agency commission charged as a single liability on the net annual profits of an integrated business, and paid in Bombay, cannot be split and allocated to Karachi profits merely because part of those profits is exempt under the Indo-Pakistan relief arrangement. The deduction was therefore confined to the liability as incurred, without apportionment against exempt profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:44:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (3) TMI 46 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277219</link>
      <description>Expenditure incurred before a new business has commenced is treated as preliminary expense and is not deductible in computing business income. Managing agency commission charged as a single liability on the net annual profits of an integrated business, and paid in Bombay, cannot be split and allocated to Karachi profits merely because part of those profits is exempt under the Indo-Pakistan relief arrangement. The deduction was therefore confined to the liability as incurred, without apportionment against exempt profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>