<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (3) TMI 46 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277219</link>
    <description>Prosecution expenses of Rs. 8,150 incurred in pursuing a repudiator of a proposed jeep sale were held non-deductible because they related to an uncommenced enterprise and therefore constituted preliminary/start-up expenditure rather than expenditure in carrying on the assessee&#039;s existing cotton business. By contrast, a managing agency commission contractually fixed as 20% of net annual profits was held to accrue and be earned where the managing agents carry on business and, as remuneration of management for an integrated enterprise, is not apportionable between Karachi and Bombay for purposes of bilateral relief; it may be deducted against Pakistan profits under the Indo Pakistan relief framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:44:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (3) TMI 46 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277219</link>
      <description>Prosecution expenses of Rs. 8,150 incurred in pursuing a repudiator of a proposed jeep sale were held non-deductible because they related to an uncommenced enterprise and therefore constituted preliminary/start-up expenditure rather than expenditure in carrying on the assessee&#039;s existing cotton business. By contrast, a managing agency commission contractually fixed as 20% of net annual profits was held to accrue and be earned where the managing agents carry on business and, as remuneration of management for an integrated enterprise, is not apportionable between Karachi and Bombay for purposes of bilateral relief; it may be deducted against Pakistan profits under the Indo Pakistan relief framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>