<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 561 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that for the computation of deduction under Section 80M of the IT Act, proportionate administrative expenses should be deducted from dividend income. Interest on borrowed money used for business purposes was deductible under Section 36(1)(iii). Guest house rent was disallowed as business expenditure, while project survey expenses were treated as revenue expenditure. Profits from the sale of shares were classified as capital gains. Business promotion and staff welfare expenses were allowed as revenue expenditures. The Tribunal&#039;s decision on Section 80M was based on a majority view, allowing deduction of proportionate expenses when dividend income is incidental to business activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 561 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that for the computation of deduction under Section 80M of the IT Act, proportionate administrative expenses should be deducted from dividend income. Interest on borrowed money used for business purposes was deductible under Section 36(1)(iii). Guest house rent was disallowed as business expenditure, while project survey expenses were treated as revenue expenditure. Profits from the sale of shares were classified as capital gains. Business promotion and staff welfare expenses were allowed as revenue expenditures. The Tribunal&#039;s decision on Section 80M was based on a majority view, allowing deduction of proportionate expenses when dividend income is incidental to business activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>