<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1504 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371161</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the seizure order under Section 129(1) of the Goods and Service Tax Act, directing the immediate release of the goods and vehicle to the petitioner. The judgment favored the petitioner due to discrepancies in interception timings and procedural shortcomings in preparing seizure memos, emphasizing the need for transparency and accuracy in enforcement actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1504 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371161</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the seizure order under Section 129(1) of the Goods and Service Tax Act, directing the immediate release of the goods and vehicle to the petitioner. The judgment favored the petitioner due to discrepancies in interception timings and procedural shortcomings in preparing seizure memos, emphasizing the need for transparency and accuracy in enforcement actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>