https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371152 The court dismissed the appeal as no illegality or perversity was found in the concurrent findings of the AO, CIT(A), and the Tribunal. The appellant's application for additional evidence was declined due to failure to meet legal requirements and suspected delay tactics. The court upheld the addition of unsecured loans and unverified purchases, as the appellant failed to establish creditworthiness and legitimacy, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without any substantial question of law arising. en-us Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371152 The court dismissed the appeal as no illegality or perversity was found in the concurrent findings of the AO, CIT(A), and the Tribunal. The appellant's application for additional evidence was declined due to failure to meet legal requirements and suspected delay tactics. The court upheld the addition of unsecured loans and unverified purchases, as the appellant failed to establish creditworthiness and legitimacy, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without any substantial question of law arising. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371152